Skip to main content
Legal Cybersecurity

Privilege doesn't protect a leaked drive.
Test what an attacker can actually reach.

Small and mid-size firms hold the same sensitive data as the AmLaw 100 — with a fraction of the controls. We give partners a clear, evidence-based picture of what an attacker can actually do, then help you close it. Under written authorization, every time.

Book a 20-Min Security Fit Call Start with a Security Reality Check
Veteran-owned OSCP-certified CEO-led engagements Written authorization only MSP-friendly

Who this is for

Small and mid-size law firms
Boutique litigation and IP firms
In-house corporate legal departments
Title, escrow, and legal-adjacent services

What we actually see

The threats hitting legal right now

Patterns drawn from current engagements and industry incident reporting (CISA, IC3, Verizon DBIR 2025). We don't test against generic checklists — we test against the attacks your peers are actually getting hit with.

BEC + wire-fraud against trust accounts

IOLTA and escrow accounts are high-value targets. We test mailbox controls, vendor-impersonation paths, and the human approval chain.

Document-management exposure

iManage, NetDocuments, and shared drives are full of privileged material. We test access-control assumptions, not just configurations.

Remote partners + personal devices

Hybrid work multiplied the attack surface. We assess VPN, SSO, conditional access, and the gap between "policy" and "deployed."

Ransomware = practice shutdown

A 72-hour outage during trial prep is a malpractice risk, not just an IT problem. We model real ransomware paths and validate recovery assumptions.

ABA Model Rule 1.6(c) — reasonable efforts

ABA Formal Opinion 477R and Rule 1.6(c) require reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized disclosure of client information. "Reasonable" increasingly means independent technical testing, not just an MSP checkbox. We document exactly that.

ABA Rule 1.6 awarePrivilege-respecting scopeWritten authorization onlyConfidential by default

How we engage with legal clients

A typical engagement path for a firm without a dedicated security team.

Start Here
Step 1 — Assess

Security Reality Check

Validated vulnerability assessment with prioritized remediation roadmap. The best first engagement for legal.

Explore Security Reality Check
Step 2 — Validate

Penetration Testing

Operator-led testing that proves what an attacker can actually do — and gives you defensible evidence for examiners, clients, and insurers.

Explore Penetration Testing
Step 3 — Defend

BlackboxEDR 24/7

Managed endpoint detection and response. MSP-friendly. Coexists with Microsoft Defender. 24/7 human eyes, not just dashboards.

Explore BlackboxEDR
Veteran-owned
OSCP-certified
CEO-led engagements
Written authorization only
MSP-friendly

Legal FAQ

How do you handle privileged material during testing?
We do not exfiltrate or read privileged content. We prove access through file-listing, hash, or metadata evidence — not by removing documents from your environment.
Is this disclosable to clients or insurers?
That is your call, in consultation with counsel. Many firms share a redacted summary with cyber insurers and key clients as a trust signal; we structure reports to make that easy.
Can you work with our existing IT vendor?
Yes. We coordinate with your IT or MSP throughout. BlackboxEDR is MSP-friendly and coexists with Microsoft Defender, so we add coverage without forcing a tooling change.

Ready to see what an attacker would see?

A 20-minute call to scope the right starting point for your legal environment. No pitch deck — a real conversation with the operator who would run your engagement.

Book a 20-Min Security Fit Call

Veteran-owned · OSCP-certified · Written authorization only · No unsolicited testing